Skip to content 
The photograph, first introduced to the public in 2005 as part of Donald Bloxham’s The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, seemed to capture an unflinching moment of cruelty during the Armenian Genocide. It portrayed a Turkish official standing over a group of emaciated Armenian children, taunting them with a piece of bread. The image was powerful and visceral, evoking intense emotions about the horrors of the genocide. However, closer examination has revealed that this photograph is not what it appears to be. It is a fabrication, a manipulated image pieced together from different sources to tell a specific, emotionally charged story.
Initially, the photograph was presented without question as a genuine artifact from the Armenian Genocide, meant to convey the suffering endured by Armenians under Ottoman rule. The caption accompanying the image described a moment of callousness in which a Turkish official was seen taunting hungry Armenians by holding a piece of bread just out of their reach. But as more rigorous research was conducted, cracks began to appear in the narrative the image sought to convey. The forensic analysis of the photograph uncovered discrepancies that pointed to its composite nature—a patchwork of elements from different photographs, carefully assembled to create a scene that was never actually captured.
One of the first anomalies identified was the figure of the Turkish official. The man in the photograph was dressed in a manner inconsistent with the typical attire worn by Ottoman officials during the time of the Armenian Genocide. Ottoman civil servants, particularly in the early 20th century, were known to wear collarless shirts, buttoned at the neck, and a fez as part of their official dress. The man in the photograph, however, wore a tie and an unbuttoned jacket, suggesting that the figure did not belong to the time period or the context in which the photograph was supposedly taken. Such anachronisms raised immediate questions about the photograph’s authenticity.
A more detailed analysis of the image further revealed that it had been altered. The man’s right arm, it turned out, was not part of the original photograph; it had been inserted from another image. His right leg appeared to be entirely missing, and parts of the children in the scene were cut and pasted from different photographs as well. The child lying on the ground with an outstretched arm, seemingly reaching for the bread, was actually not holding anything. In fact, the manipulator of the image had not even bothered to properly cut around the child’s fingers, leaving visible signs of the alteration.
The background, too, was inconsistent with the rest of the image. The wall behind the man abruptly transitioned into a blank, featureless white space, a telltale sign of a composite image. These discrepancies were enough to raise suspicions about the photograph’s provenance and prompted further investigation into its origins.
The photograph, upon scrutiny, revealed itself to be an example of deliberate manipulation. It had been created by combining elements from multiple photographs, carefully edited to present a compelling narrative that was not grounded in historical reality. In fact, the image was a forgery, created to serve a specific propaganda purpose.
When these findings were brought to the attention of Oxford University Press, which had published The Great Game of Genocide, the publisher acted swiftly to correct the error. The book’s stock was destroyed, and a new edition was released with a revised caption. The updated caption made it clear that the image was not genuine, but rather a fabricated composite, created from various sources. It also emphasized that the image was included in previous publications, such as Gérard Chaliand and Yves Ternon’s Le Genocide des Arméniens (1980), where it had been mistaken for an authentic photograph.
This incident serves as a cautionary tale for historians, particularly those who rely on visual sources to reconstruct historical events. In the digital age, images are easily manipulated, and even photographs, once seen as reliable evidence, can be altered to suit particular narratives. The forgery of the 1915 photograph demonstrates how visual evidence can be crafted to evoke strong emotional responses, regardless of its historical accuracy.
For historians, this incident highlights the importance of critically evaluating visual sources. While written documents can be scrutinized for authenticity, photographs often receive less rigorous examination. Yet, as this case demonstrates, photographs are not infallible. They must be subject to the same level of scrutiny and investigation as textual sources to ensure the historical record remains as accurate and truthful as possible.
In the broader context of the Armenian Genocide, where political and historical narratives are deeply contested, the manipulation of images has often played a role in shaping perceptions. The Armenian Genocide remains a topic of significant debate, with some governments and organizations continuing to deny or downplay the scale of the atrocities. Propaganda on both sides has shaped the public understanding of the event, with forged and manipulated images sometimes used to further particular political agendas.
The 1915 photograph of starving Armenians and a Turkish official , once presented as a poignant symbol of the genocide, now serves as a reminder of the power of visual storytelling and the potential for distortion. The creation and subsequent exposure of the photograph as a forgery demonstrate the importance of questioning historical narratives, whether conveyed through words or images.
Ultimately, the incident surrounding the forged 1915 photograph underscores the necessity of rigorous investigation when engaging with historical sources. As this case shows, even a single image can have a profound impact on how history is remembered and interpreted. For historians and scholars, it is a clear example of the need for vigilance in evaluating sources and ensuring that the historical record remains as accurate and truthful as possible.
- Seeing the Unseen: 2024 Infrared Photography Contest Winners - January 19, 2025
- How Instagram’s New Layout Is Transforming the Creative Landscape - January 19, 2025
- Amazing Photos of the 1969 Holden Hurricane - January 17, 2025
